Female promiscuity - Wikipedia
"Women love getting laid as much as men do, possibly more." Non-human female primates will also take great risks to get the sex they want. But socially, many straight men still find it a turnoff when women are I've never been one of those people who sees the humanity in all . For example, women who initiate dates are viewed by men as more promiscuous and. The median American woman has had three sex partners in her lifetime. The residents of Promiscuous America are less likely to be married and more likely to be Category: Dating, Infidelity, Single Life, Women, Men . But averages don't reveal human behavior at the margins, and a narrow sliver of.
In the Middle East, sacred prostitutionusually in honor of Goddess Astartehad been prevalent before the 4th century when Emperor Constantine I attempted to replace pagan traditions with Christianity. Imperial Rome is popularly seen as being sexually profligate,   and certain Roman empresses—such as Theodora IMessalina and Julia the Elder —gained in their lifetime a reputation of extreme promiscuity.
On the field of pleasure she [Empress Theodora] was never defeated. Often she would go picnicking with ten young men or more, in the flower of their strength and virility, and dallied with them all, the whole night through.
How Theodora, the most depraved of all courtesans, won his love The Bible features many female personages identified as being promiscuous, among them the Whore of BabylonPrincess JezebelProphetess JezebelGomerRahabSalomeand Potiphar's unnamed wife. Yet she [Oholibah] increased her harlotry, remembering the days of her youth, when she played the harlot in the land of Egypt and doted upon her paramours there, whose members were like those of asses, and whose issue was like that of horses.
The development of chastity beltsapparently in the 14th century, proved handy to men worried about the prospect of their wives committing adultery.
Many cultures have historically laid much restriction on sexuality, most emphatically against immoderate expression of sexuality by women. In contrast, some recent ethical philosophies—both secular coming from individualism and sex-positive feminism and religious e. We believe that it is fundamentally a radical political act to deprivatize sex. So much oppression in our culture is based on shame about sex: We are all oppressed. We have all been taught, one way or another, that our desires, our bodies, our sexualities, are shameful.
What better way to defeat oppression than to get together in communities and celebrate the wonders of sex? Group Sex, Public Sex, Orgies… Public opinion has fluctuated over the centuries, with such downturns as New England Puritanism — and the Victorian era —when hypersexuality was often treated as an exclusively female disorder, diagnosed on the grounds of as little as masturbation alone see here.
This environment gave rise in the late 19th century to the feminist ideal called "the New Woman "—a personification of female economic, sexual and other autonomy—which had a profound influence on feminism well into the 20th century. It wasn't until the Married Women's Property Act that female British citizens were no longer legally compelled, upon marriage, to transfer all their property to their husbands.
Data should smash the biological myth of promiscuous males and sexually coy females
The Women's Movement was closely allied with the free love movement, whose advocates had a strong belief that a woman ought to be herself sovereign over her body. Laws against adultery [were] based upon the idea that woman is a chattel, so that to make love to a married woman is to deprive the husband of her services.
It is the frankest and most crass statement of a slave-situation. To us, every woman … has … an absolute right to travel in her own orbit. There is no reason why she should not be the ideal hausfrauif that chance to be her will. But society has no right to insist upon that standard.
It was, for practical reasons, almost necessary to set up such taboos in small communities, savage tribes, where the wife was nothing but a general servant, where the safety of the people depended upon a high birth-rate. But to-day woman is economically independent, becomes more so every year. The result is that she instantly asserts her right to have as many or as few men or babies as she wants or can get; and she defies the world to interfere with her.
More power to her! The s in America is stereotyped to have been sexually repressed, though not as severely as the Victorian era. Female promiscuity in particular became substantially more accepted in Western culture after the sexual revolution of the s, which resonated with the hippie movement. It also became more prevalent a theme in mass mediaincluding cinema e. In addition to her sexually explicit song lyrics and occasional nude self exposures during live performances and almost being arrested in TorontoOntarioCanada, on May 29, for simulating masturbation in public her book Sex released on Oct 21, was a commercially successful nude pictorial of her and various famous celebrities engaging in scenes of purported promiscuity, further enhancing her vision of gender equality in this regard.
Finally, my tally of sex partners ignores sexual orientation. The figure below looks at what portion of the sample for each survey year falls into the top five percentile for the entire sample; in order words, what proportion of women for each survey year had 16 or more partners.
The data show a linear increase in the percentage of women who fall into the high side of sexual adventurousness. Bythis number was up to 7 percent.
The story is different for men, for whom promiscuity was most common in the previous decade. Since then, a declining proportion of men have had 50 or more sex partners. Still, top-five percentile sexual exploration remains a bit more common for men than it was in the early s, near the beginning of the time series. They watch more porn. Many of them live in the western United States for women, that means the intermountain west more than the west coast. Still, in terms of sheer percentage points, the differences between Christians and nonbelievers are not enormous.
Chi-square tests statistically significant at the. Religious participation also has the anticipated negative correlation with promiscuity: Regular attendance defined as several times a month or more translates into the lowest odds of sexual sybaritism. Occasional attendance produces middling rates of sexual adventurism. Regularly darkening the door of a church, synagogue, or mosque may both reinforce doctrinal proscriptions against promiscuity and offer social reinforcement about the desirability of monogamy.
People with post-graduate degrees are much more likely than their less-educated peers to be promiscuous, and this is especially true of women. Both these numbers are far higher than they are for people with less formal education. Generally speaking, people with high levels of education have the highest marriage rates and the lowest divorce rates, but their ranks also contain a sprinkling of sexual sybarites.
Related to education is the comparably higher intelligence of sexually adventurous Americans. Both men and women in the top percentile of promiscuity report higher intelligence scores than do their less well-traveled peers. Top-five percentile men have IQs only slightly higher than their less sexually adventurous peers. T-tests between low- and high-promiscuity groups are statistically significant except between top-five percent men and bottom percent men.
The link between education and sexual exploration has long been clear.
In his brilliant and ethically-challenged study of anonymous gay sex, the late sociologist Laud Humphreys observed that his educated respondents were more willing to explore a range of sexual activities.
National data also show higher rates of anal sex among educated women. A small number of highly educated people seem to have channeled this curiosity into promiscuity. Perhaps this dynamic can also explain the proclivity for poly-partner promiscuity and intelligence. Finally, these associations seem particularly strong for women. There are modest but still statistically significant differences in respondent happiness by promiscuity. Multivariate analysis reveals that the happiness gap between Promiscuous America and their less sexually adventurous peers can be partly explained by marital status.
Recall that promiscuous survey respondents are less likely to be married and more likely to be divorced.